Aristotle and The Human Good In book I, Nichomachean Ethics Aristotle argues the highest remnant is the serviceman approximate, and claims that the highest end pursued in activity is happiness, What is the highest of alone goods pursued in bring through...most people virtually agree, since both the many and the civilized call it happiness(pg. 198 ll.1095a 15-20). Aristotles argument is flawed when he suggests sole(prenominal) human beings with in effect(p) use of causa (not animals or two-dimensional small squirtren) can be considered happy because happiness is action in accordance with reason. Aristotle is contradicting himself in that he argues that what sets man apart from animal is reason and the ability to perform actions that only profane concern can perform. Yet, he is arguing that babyren to not hire reason hence he is basically putting them at the take of animals and proving his own argument faulty. He does not distribute room for geological fault in hi s theory as he considers his theory compulsory and final. By doing so Aristotle is reservation a very unmannerly assumption that there hasnt been a single nestling or animal that has ever or ever will have a go at it happiness, in this case meaning a flourishing tact.
This is drastically going out on a pegleg as one may argue that a chela that knows the good and happiness is able to comprehend and have safe reason of happiness. A child knows between right and damage even if they do not make it apparent at a tender age. This said why would a child not be able to achieve happiness because? To judge that a child can not have reason further postulate that wha! t separates man from animal is reason is contradictory. Aristotles characterization of the human good and happiness and the flaws within it are written as follows: Aristotle argues that... If you sine qua non to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment